Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://digipres.club/@timixretroplays" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>timixretroplays</span></a></span> yeah, I guess this shows <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.scot/@rasteri" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>rasteri</span></a></span> build this before businesses started upgrading tech.</p><p>I wished DM&P / ICOP would increase production or that there was an easier way to get other <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ix86" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ix86</span></a> SBCs from like <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/VIA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>VIA</span></a> (remember when they made <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/CUP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CUP</span></a>|s?) or some <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/embedded" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>embedded</span></a> variants from <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Intel</span></a> or <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a>.</p><ul><li><p>Cuz I was shure some <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/IntelAtom" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IntelAtom</span></a> SoC's and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AMDGseries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AMDGseries</span></a> APUs do have <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ISA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ISA</span></a> support as they use quite older process nodes and microarchitectures.</p></li><li><p>But for a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/MSDOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MSDOS</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RetroGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RetroGaming</span></a> system, that is quite a bottleneck to work on when it comes to <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/BareMetal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BareMetal</span></a>.</p></li></ul><p><a href="https://infosec.space/tags/DOSBOX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DOSBOX</span></a> or similar do work well, but they don't provide the necessary I/O for a lot of use-cases.</p><ul><li>I was looking at <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PC104Plus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PC104Plus</span></a> (for my <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/tiny486" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>tiny486</span></a> <a href="http://github.com/os-1337/tiny486" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">project</a>) which just adds <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PCI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PCI</span></a> on the opposite side of the board to the ISA pins but otherwise retains <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PC104" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PC104</span></a> compatibility.</li></ul><p>Maybe you can drop in a different <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Vortex86" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Vortex86</span></a> which also has <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ISA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ISA</span></a>?</p><ul><li>I know there are also <a href="https://www.vortex86.com/products/Vortex86EX2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Vortex86EX2</a> and others that may be an option...</li></ul>