avlap<p>Why is the <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/FSF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FSF</span></a> recommending the <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/Apache2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Apache2</span></a> license as permissive license above <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/MIT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MIT</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/ISC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ISC</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/BSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BSD</span></a> etc.? </p><p>Sneaky way way to promote <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/GPL3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GPL3</span></a> above <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/GPL2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GPL2</span></a>? As far as I know Apache 2 is not compatible with GPL2. </p><p>Why in the world would one choose a permissive license which is not compatible with GPL2? <br> <br><a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/license" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>license</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.nl/tags/software" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>software</span></a></p>