American Naturalist<p>Januario et al. found no correlation between sexual selection intensity & speciation rates or proxy traits. Because sexual selection intensity has high intraspecific variation and low phylogenetic signal, its macroevolutionary impacts are weak. Read now!<br><a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/734457" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1</span><span class="invisible">086/734457</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/sexualSelection" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>sexualSelection</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/speciation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>speciation</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/intraspecificVariation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>intraspecificVariation</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/phylogenetics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>phylogenetics</span></a> <a href="https://ecoevo.social/tags/macroevolution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>macroevolution</span></a></p>