techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

4.8K
active users

#scientificpublishing

3 posts3 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@ElenLeFoll

"We’ll fill this industry with people who think they’re good, because their bot passed CI. They'll float through, confident, while the real ones - the hungry ones - get chewed up by a system that doesn’t value understanding anymore. Just output. Just tokens per second."

Mutatis mutandis, this is what happened to scientific publishing in academia. Output over understanding.

Dear Readers, Researchers, and Followers,
It is with the utmost delight that we announce: ACIG has been approved for indexing in Scopus – one of the most prestigious scientific databases in the world!
This achievement would not have been possible without the outstanding contributions of our brilliant Authors, our esteemed Reviewers, and the continued interest and support of our Readers. Please accept our deepest and most heartfelt thanks.
We would also like to express our sincere appreciation to the dedicated professionals behind the publishing process at ACIG – both past and present. In particular, we wish to honour our Editor-in-Chief @agasztold whose commitment is truly invaluable, as well as Dorota Domalewska, Agnieszka Wrońska, Ruben Arcos, Marek Górka, Krzysztof Silicki, Anna Sitkowska, Katarzyna Nakonieczna, Katarzyna Dudzińska, Jacek Leśkow, and Nikola Zbyszewska-Strus.
ACIG is expected to appear in Scopus search results within the next few months.

ONLINE registration is now open for the DIAMAS Final Conference on 3 June 2025 !
Why attend?
- Explore the outcomes of the DIAMAS project
- Connect with policymakers, researchers, and OA practitioners
- Contribute to shaping a sustainable, inclusive Diamond OA ecosystem
- Online event – Free to attend

Register now via Eventbrite:
eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-future-

EventbriteThe Future of Diamond OA Publishing in Europe and BeyondJoin us as we discuss the exciting advancements and challenges facing open access publishing in Europe and beyond!

Session 1 of the 18th EASE Conference, Disinformation in Publishing, is in progress.

Our keynote speaker Nicolien van der Linden says:
"Misinformation and disinformation have been identified by the World Economic Forum as the greatest threats to global stability in 2024 and 2025."

She added, "If we can't agree on what disinformation is, how can we fight it? What exactly are we combating?"

Yesterday's highlight: I learned that my blog post/ rant about how fucked up scientific publishing is was picked up by a course on scientific writing 🤭. The PhD student in my project is doing the course and she spotted it as part of the reading list. How cool is that 😊.
marioangst.com/en/blog/posts/s

marioangst.comWhat’s wrong fucked up with scientific publishing – Mario Angst

Our #scientificPublishing is not 100% a problem, I am happy to be reminded today as we get reviews for a manuscript.

Not just because we got very pleasing reviews, not even just because they are interesting. Of course that helps a lot, but beyond that the main points are:
- reviewers read the paper in detail,
- they took genuine interest in the science in it,
- they make helpful comments,
- they ask relevant questions
- they're not suggesting a single paper [of their own] to cite,

1/2

"The biggest mystery is not why arXiv succeeded. Rather, it’s how it wasn’t killed by vested interests intent on protecting traditional academic publishing."

Very interesting interview profile of Paul Ginsparg in WIRED narrating the history of arXiv:
wired.com/story/inside-arxiv-m

WIRED · Inside arXiv—the Most Transformative Platform in All of ScienceBy Sheon Han

Nice talk by @givingtools about @unjournal youtube.com/watch?v=PegsSgZnap , which uses peer-review-curate, for economics-related research, that we are also using at MetaROR.org for meta-science.

Provides journal-neutral quality peer reviews. They include some quantitative ratings, which we don't currently do at MetaRoR. #scientificPublishing