techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

5.3K
active users

#e2ee

41 posts32 participants1 post today
René Mayrhofer :verified: 🇺🇦 🇹🇼<p>Sigh. We are, as a security community, making good progress on some old as well as some new topics. <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Rust" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Rust</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Go" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Go</span></a>, and other memory safe systems languages are going well and having a real impact in reducing memory safety issues - which has been the most important security bug class for decades, and we are finally improving! Compartmentalization and isolation of processes and services have now become common knowledge and the minimum bar for new designs. Security and privacy by design are being honored in many new projects, and not just as lip service, but because the involved developers deeply believe in these principles nowadays. <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> is finally available to most end-users, both for messaging and backups.</p><p>And again and again, we are forced into having discussions (<a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/03/eu_backdoor_encryption/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theregister.com/2025/04/03/eu_</span><span class="invisible">backdoor_encryption/</span></a>) about breaking all the progress.</p><p>Let me be clear for Nth time: <br>* We *cannot* build encryption systems that can only be broken by the "good guys". If they are not completely secure, foreign enemy states, organized crime, and intimate partners will break and abuse them as well. There is no halfway in this technology. Either it is secure or it isn't - for and against everybody.<br>* We *cannot* build safe, government-controlled censorship filters into our global messaging apps that are not totally broken under the assumption of (current or future) bad government policies and/or insider attacks at the technology providers (<a href="https://www.mayrhofer.eu.org/talk/insider-attack-resistance-in-the-android-ecosystem/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">mayrhofer.eu.org/talk/insider-</span><span class="invisible">attack-resistance-in-the-android-ecosystem/</span></a>). Either one-to-one communication remains secure and private, or it doesn't (<a href="https://www.ins.jku.at/chatcontrol/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">ins.jku.at/chatcontrol/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>).<br>* We *cannot* allow exploitation of open security vulnerabilities in smartphones or other devices for law enforcement. If they are not closed, they are exploitable by everybody. "Nobody but us" is an illusion, and makes everybody less secure.</p><p>My latest recorded public talk on the topic was <a href="https://www.mayrhofer.eu.org/talk/secure-messaging-and-attacks-against-it/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">mayrhofer.eu.org/talk/secure-m</span><span class="invisible">essaging-and-attacks-against-it/</span></a>, and nothing factual has changed since then. Policymakers keep asking for a different technological reality than the one we live in, and that sort of thing doesn't tend to produce good, sustainable outcomes.</p><p>(Edited to only fix a typo. No content changes.)</p><p>CC <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@epicenter_works" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>epicenter_works</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://eupolicy.social/@edri" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>edri</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@suka_hiroaki" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>suka_hiroaki</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.heise.de/@heisec" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>heisec</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://ioc.exchange/@matthew_d_green" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>matthew_d_green</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://eupolicy.social/@ilumium" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>ilumium</span></a></span></p>
Debacle<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.uno/@Madmonkey" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Madmonkey</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://livellosegreto.it/@kenobit" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>kenobit</span></a></span></p><p>Sorry, if I misintpret your post, trying to understand Italian based on my mediocre Spanish 🙂</p><p><a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/XMPP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>XMPP</span></a> itself does not define <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a>, but almost all clients do support <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/OMEMO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OMEMO</span></a> encryption, which is more or less copied from Signal.</p><p>In addition, you can choose a trustworthy provider, such a <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/cooperative" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cooperative</span></a> or club.</p><p>Maybe for that reasons, German <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/police" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>police</span></a> seems to believe (wrongly), that <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/Jabber" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Jabber</span></a> (the traditional name of XMPP) were "the first pillar of <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/cybercrime" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cybercrime</span></a>"!</p><p><a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/UseJabberDoCrime" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UseJabberDoCrime</span></a></p>
Scimmia di Mare<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://livellosegreto.it/@kenobit" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>kenobit</span></a></span> ho letto e condivido tutto.<br>Solo una accortezza: <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/XMPP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>XMPP</span></a> non è cifrato <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a>. Se posso fidarmi di te, non ho idea di chi sia il tuo host o, se lo tieni a casa, il tuo ISP.<br>Ed in ogni caso, a queste condizioni, compromettere un nodo significa esporre molta gente a rischio.</p>
Bhavani Shankar 💭<span class="h-card"><a class="u-url mention" href="https://fosstodon.org/@Mehrad" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Mehrad</span></a></span> The market telegram has captured is file sharing and crypto groups. If you join a group you can see all history and files. It's difficult to achieve with <a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/e2ee" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#e2ee</a>
Mehrad :kde: :emacs: :rstats:<p>I wonder why <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Telegram" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Telegram</span></a>'s normal chat are not encrypted. being E2EE key exchange is not a good excuse because both WhatsApp and Signal do <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> and they support multiple client.</p><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Privacy</span></a></p>
PrivacyDigest<p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/UK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UK</span></a> Effort To Keep <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Encryption</span></a> Fight <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Secret" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Secret</span></a> Is Blocked - Slashdot <br><a href="https://mas.to/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/security" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>security</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://apple.slashdot.org/story/25/04/07/1444256/uk-effort-to-keep-apple-encryption-fight-secret-is-blocked?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">apple.slashdot.org/story/25/04</span><span class="invisible">/07/1444256/uk-effort-to-keep-apple-encryption-fight-secret-is-blocked?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed</span></a></p>
Open Rights Group<p>ORG has joined 237 civil society groups, companies and cybersecurity experts in an open letter to members of the Swedish Riksdag.</p><p>We call on them to reject legislation that would force companies to undermine the encryption of their services.</p><p>Read more ⬇️</p><p><a href="https://www.globalencryption.org/2025/04/joint-letter-on-swedish-data-storage-and-access-to-electronic-information-legislation/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">globalencryption.org/2025/04/j</span><span class="invisible">oint-letter-on-swedish-data-storage-and-access-to-electronic-information-legislation/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/cybersecurity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cybersecurity</span></a></p>
DVD e.V.<p>Die <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/DVD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DVD</span></a> hat zusammen mit über 235 NGO, akademischen und Cybersicherheits-Experten sowie Unternehmen einen offenen Brief zum schwedischen Gesetzentwurf zur Datenspeicherung und zum Zugriff auf elektrische Informationen an die Mitglieder des schwedischen Reichstags unterzeichnet, der heute versandt wurde.<br>Wir kämpfen weiter gegen die Versuche der Schwächung der Ende-zu-Ende-Verschlüsselung (<a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a>).<br>Zum offenen Brief:<br><a href="https://www.datenschutzverein.de/2025/04/offener-brief-zum-schwedischen-gesetzentwurf-zur-datenspeicherung-und-zum-zugriff-auf-elektrische-informationen/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">datenschutzverein.de/2025/04/o</span><span class="invisible">ffener-brief-zum-schwedischen-gesetzentwurf-zur-datenspeicherung-und-zum-zugriff-auf-elektrische-informationen/</span></a></p>
Bhavani Shankar 💭Did you enable RCS in your phone? It's nice to send end to end encrypted chats with a builtin app. But the experience is ruined by spam from bottom feeders like hdfc bank, chroma store etc. <br><br>No I don't want a credit card or to buy your overpriced apartment. Never deal with these guys. It took 2 weeks of spamming the unsubscribe button for hdfc to stop sending their garbage to my email. <br><br><a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/hdfc" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#hdfc</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/chroma" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#chroma</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/india" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#india</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/rcs" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#rcs</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://fe.disroot.org/tag/e2ee" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#e2ee</a>
Ian Brown 👨🏻‍💻<p>Love this, as I hate bloody voice notes! <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> and on-device. Question: are they are used anyway to train WA model? 🧐 <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/WhatsApp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WhatsApp</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/VoiceNote" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>VoiceNote</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/transcripts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>transcripts</span></a></p>
ilias :thepiratebay:<p>well the whole thing just gets more interesting :blobcatpopcornnom: </p><p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgn1lz3v4no" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgn1l</span><span class="invisible">z3v4no</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Privacy</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Encryption</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/UnitedKingdom" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UnitedKingdom</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/UK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UK</span></a></p>
Open Rights Group<p>There is now the opportunity for some public scrutiny of the UK government’s decisions to attack technologies that keep us safe online.</p><p>We must stand against the attack on encryption.</p><p>Sign and share our petition to keep Apple data encrypted ⬇️</p><p><a href="https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/keep-our-apple-data-encrypted" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions</span><span class="invisible">/keep-our-apple-data-encrypted</span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>apple</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpolitics</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpol</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/cybersecurity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cybersecurity</span></a></p>
Open Rights Group<p>"This is bigger than the UK and Apple.</p><p>The Court’s judgment will have implications for the privacy and security of millions of people around the world.</p><p>Such an important decision cannot be made behind closed doors and we welcome the IPT’s decision to bring parts of the hearing into the open."</p><p>🗣️ <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@jim" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>jim</span></a></span> – ORG Executive Director.</p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>apple</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/cybersecurity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cybersecurity</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpol</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpol</span></a></p>
Open Rights Group<p>Earlier this year, the UK government ordered Apple to grant it access to encrypted data stored by Apple users worldwide in its cloud service.</p><p>The secret order was made under the Investigatory Powers Act and the government has tried to keep the public in the dark ever since. Even when Apple appealed the order.</p><p>Now there will be some level of transparency with today's decision.</p><p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-appealing-against-uk-governments-back-door-order-tribunal-confirms-2025-04-07/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">reuters.com/technology/apple-a</span><span class="invisible">ppealing-against-uk-governments-back-door-order-tribunal-confirms-2025-04-07/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>apple</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpolitics</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpol</span></a></p>
Open Rights Group<p>BREAKING: The UK government's attempt to hold the Apple encryption case entirely in secret has been REJECTED.</p><p>ORG, Big Brother Watch and Index on Censorship made a submission to the court arguing for open justice.</p><p>In a win for privacy rights, the court agrees.</p><p>It said it didn't accept “that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security”.</p><p><a href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/ipt-supports-orgs-call-for-open-hearing-in-apple-encryption-case-uk/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">openrightsgroup.org/press-rele</span><span class="invisible">ases/ipt-supports-orgs-call-for-open-hearing-in-apple-encryption-case-uk/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>apple</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpolitics</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ukpol</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a></p>
Jim Killock<p>BREAKING: VICTORY for <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>openrightsgroup</span></a></span> BBW and <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.xyz/@privacyint" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>privacyint</span></a></span> and others</p><p>The <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a> IPT case will be held in open, including the bare details of the case, so that the principles of the issue can be discussed! <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>e2ee</span></a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a></p>
Karl Voit :emacs: :orgmode:<p>If you need <a href="https://graz.social/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> via <a href="https://graz.social/tags/email" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>email</span></a>, the only 2 valid standards are <a href="https://graz.social/tags/OpenPGP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenPGP</span></a> and <a href="https://graz.social/tags/SMIME" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SMIME</span></a>. </p><p>It's not that those are without issues but everything else is mediocre.</p><p>Yes, you can switch to non-email-services as well such as <a href="https://graz.social/tags/Signal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Signal</span></a>. But that's a different island.</p><p><a href="https://graz.social/tags/security" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>security</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/mail" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mail</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/GMail" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GMail</span></a></p>
Ian Brown 👨🏻‍💻<p>BOOOOM! UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal dismisses with extreme prejudice (§43) the UK <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23HomeOffice" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#HomeOffice</a> attempt to cover up the case brought by <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23Apple" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#Apple</a> against the global snooping order from the Home Office against Advanced Data Protection 🚀 h/t <a class="mention" href="https://bsky.app/profile/kind.ac" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@kind.ac</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23IPT" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#IPT</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23ADP" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#ADP</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23E2EE" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#E2EE</a> <a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...</a><br><br><a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl...</a></p>
Hache☕<p>Si usas <a href="https://masto.es/tags/GMail" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GMail</span></a> y te has enterado de su última afirmación de introducir un verdadero <a href="https://masto.es/tags/cifrado" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cifrado</span></a> de extremo a extremo: es mentira.</p><p>Google tiene el control y/o no puedes hacer nada en contra de que Google tome el control en cualquier momento. </p><p>El <a href="https://masto.es/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> real funciona de otra manera: sólo el emisor y el receptor pueden acceder al contenido protegido. </p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2025/04/are-new-google-e2ee-emails-really-end-to-end-encrypted-kinda-but-not-really/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">arstechnica.com/security/2025/</span><span class="invisible">04/are-new-google-e2ee-emails-really-end-to-end-encrypted-kinda-but-not-really/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://michal.sapka.pl/2025/gmail-e2e-is-as-terrible-as-expected/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">michal.sapka.pl/2025/gmail-e2e</span><span class="invisible">-is-as-terrible-as-expected/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://masto.es/tags/Meta" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Meta</span></a> también definió el E2EE de tal manera que el mensaje se cifra desde el emisor hasta ellos, se procesa en texto claro y se vuelve a cifrar para la transmisión al receptor.</p><p>No dejes que te engañen con afirmaciones falsas y definiciones erróneas.</p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://graz.social/@publicvoit" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>publicvoit</span></a></span> <a href="https://graz.social/@publicvoit/114295836158573196" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">graz.social/@publicvoit/114295</span><span class="invisible">836158573196</span></a></p>
Karl Voit :emacs: :orgmode:<p>If you're using <a href="https://graz.social/tags/GMail" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GMail</span></a> and you've learned about their latest claim to introduce real end-to-end <a href="https://graz.social/tags/encryption" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>encryption</span></a>: it's a lie.</p><p>Google has the control and/or you can't do anything against that Google takes control any time. </p><p>Real <a href="https://graz.social/tags/E2EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>E2EE</span></a> works differently: only the sender and receiver are able to access the protected content. </p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2025/04/are-new-google-e2ee-emails-really-end-to-end-encrypted-kinda-but-not-really/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">arstechnica.com/security/2025/</span><span class="invisible">04/are-new-google-e2ee-emails-really-end-to-end-encrypted-kinda-but-not-really/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://michal.sapka.pl/2025/gmail-e2e-is-as-terrible-as-expected/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">michal.sapka.pl/2025/gmail-e2e</span><span class="invisible">-is-as-terrible-as-expected/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://graz.social/tags/Meta" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Meta</span></a> also defined E2EE such that the message is encrypted from the sender to them, processed in clear text and re-encrypted for the transmission to the receiver.</p><p>Don't let them fool you with false claims and wrong definitions.</p><p><a href="https://graz.social/tags/Google" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Google</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/security" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>security</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/privacy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/PIM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PIM</span></a> <a href="https://graz.social/tags/email" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>email</span></a></p>