RaymondPierreL3<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://aus.social/@InsurgoFormica" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>InsurgoFormica</span></a></span> <br>Both <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Greens" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Greens</span></a> and <a href="https://aus.social/tags/LNP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LNP</span></a> (coalition or not) would have to radically change their political platform to appeal to voters well enough to be in a position to govt (minority Govt or not). There is scope in the electorate to grow the <a href="https://aus.social/tags/crossbench" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>crossbench</span></a> but I cannot see LNP working with that either.</p><p>Also, remember that the diehard LNP supporters are in a minority in the electorate and in dwindling numbers in the future. Which is why I say that <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Libs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Libs</span></a> would have to ditch <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Nats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Nats</span></a> and return to the center-right <a href="https://aus.social/tags/liberalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>liberalism</span></a> of old (pre- Howard) before any govt could be formed by Libs and crossbench — but that’s <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Labor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Labor</span></a>’s option as well… So, I reckon, not so volatile in vote results for at least a decade or so. </p><p>PS I’m not a betting man so I’ll wager on my follish prognostics. LOL</p>