techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

4.7K
active users

#pragmatists

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
A.Stringer<p>One side – let’s call them the <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/pragmatists" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pragmatists</span></a> – view <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>politics</span></a> purely in terms of <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/policies" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>policies</span></a> enacted and material change on the ground. The other – let’s call them the <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/idealists" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>idealists</span></a> – see a role for demonstrating their principles and modelling them in public. It is a debate that has simmered for centuries, and yet seems to catch each new <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/politicalgeneration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>politicalgeneration</span></a> unawares."</p><p><a href="https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/6399" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">newhumanist.org.uk/articles/63</span><span class="invisible">99</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/labourparty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>labourparty</span></a> <br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/labourpartyhistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>labourpartyhistory</span></a> <br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/UKpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UKpol</span></a><br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/labourpartypolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>labourpartypolitics</span></a> <br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/LabourPartyphilosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LabourPartyphilosophy</span></a><br><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Labourvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Labourvalues</span></a></p>
CJ Stevens - Metaphysiology<p>A question for the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pragmatists" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pragmatists</span></a>:<br> <br>Anyone know of work that traces the evolution of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Dewey" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Dewey</span></a>'s understanding of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/memory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>memory</span></a> as a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cognitive" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>cognitive</span></a> function? </p><p>I ask this as I re-read Reconstruction in Philosophy and take full measure of just how empirically incorrect almost everything in the first few pages is with respect to what we know about memory qua vital function. It seems to me that by Logic his view is quite different, so I'm curious if someone has tracked this point. Thanks!</p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>philosophy</span></a></span> <br><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/@dewey" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>dewey</span></a></span></p>