Is it just me who is excited (!) - and pleased - to see a technical article (1) actually include the link to the paper, and (2) using the paper's doi.org URL?!!
Nice work #LiveScience !!!!
-----
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956536124000166
#paper #reference #DOI #URL #reference #link
@LiveScience
@GregCocks you have company. the presence of those breadcrumbs is how I distinguish between popularizations and actual science reporting. Alas, the paper mills clutter the landscape with useless or harmful content.
@ottomate agreed; I am also picky in what papers to look at too, plenty of nonsense so-called journals these days peddling shoddy 'research'