techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

4.7K
active users

#crossposting

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

Frage | Lemmy: Das Fediverse/Crossposting Dilemma


Auf vielen Lemmy Instanzen ist Crossposting nicht wirklich gerne gesehen, jedoch beißt sich das mit dem 'Social Media' Teil des Fediverse. Ich erwähne z. B. in einen Beitrag die beiden Lemmy Communitys Deutschland (Feddit) und Aktivismus (Feddit) da der Beitrag beide betrifft. Nun wäre das aber da die Communitys auf dem gleichen Server sind, ein klassisches Crossposting das ja nicht gewollt ist. Wie kann man das Problem also umgehen bzw. gibt es dazu schön Gedanken/Ansätze/Lösungen.

#Frage #Fediverse #Lemmy #Crossposting #Communitys #Erwähnen #2025-06-29 @askfedi_de @askfedi

feddit.orgDeutschland - feddit.orgAbout Sammelbecken für deutsche Kartoffeln und ihre Nachrichten, Geschichten, Diskussionen über Deutschland. Nicht zu verwechseln mit !dach@feddit.org [/c/dach@feddit.org] [https://feddit.org/c/dach] , das für gesamten Europäischen deutschsprachigen Raum zuständig ist. ___ Einsteigertipps für Neue gibt es hier [https://feddit.org/post/8887388]. ___ Schreibt hier Beiträge, die ganz Deutschland betreffen, nicht nur einen kleinen Teil. Wir haben andere Communities für Bundesländer und Lokalnachrichten: Städte / Landkreise -!bonn [https://feddit.org/c/bonn] -!magdeburg [https://feddit.org/c/magdeburg] -!braunschweig [https://feddit.org/c/braunschweig] -!bochum [https://feddit.org/c/bochum] -!duisburg [https://feddit.org/c/duisburg] -!heidelberg [https://feddit.org/c/heidelberg] -!chemnitz [https://feddit.org/c/chemnitz] -!stuttgart [https://feddit.org/c/stuttgart] -!cologne [https://feddit.org/c/cologne] -!augsburg [https://feddit.org/c/augsburg] -!wuppertal [https://feddit.org/c/wuppertal] -!dresden [https://feddit.org/c/dresden] -!ostwestfalen-Lippe [https://feddit.org/c/owl] -!karlsruhe [https://feddit.org/c/karlsruhe] -!rostock [https://feddit.org/c/rostock] ___ Bundesländer: -!bremen [https://feddit.org/c/bremen] -!niedersachsen [https://feddit.org/c/niedersachsen] -!nrw [https://feddit.org/c/nrw] -!sachsen [https://feddit.org/c/sachsen] -!bayern [https://feddit.org/c/bayern] -!hamburg [https://feddit.org/c/hamburg] -!berlin [https://feddit.org/c/berlin] -!badenwuerttemberg [https://feddit.org/c/badenwuerttemberg] -!schleswig_holstein [https://feddit.org/c/schleswig_holstein] -!rlp [https://feddit.org/c/rlp] (Rheinland-Pfalz) ___ Regeln Seid nett zueinander. Sinnlose Provokationen ohne Inhalt werden gelöscht und User gebannt Vom Posten von aktuellen Wahlumfragen bitten wir zurzeit Abstand zu nehmen. Begründung [https://feddit.org/post/10334804] ___ Zusätzlich: alle Regeln, die ihr auf Feddit.org [http://Feddit.org] in der Sidebar lesen könnt. ___

tl;dr — how do PieFed/Lemmy/Mbin handle cross-posting?

Currently, when a NodeBB admin moves a topic from the uncategorized pseudo-category into a local category, we federate out an as:Announce, people typically think of that as a "boost" or "share".

That worked fine when the entirety of the category list was your local categories plus the "uncategorized" pseudo-category. However, now that NodeBB is moving towards supporting remote categories (via group actors), this UX makes less sense. We wouldn't want to "move" a topic out of the category it is supposed to be in, just for visibility to other local users. Additionally, topic moving was limited to administrators, and from the get-go we knew it would eventually cause issues because people other than admins would want to share topics to other local users.

This is where the "cross-post" functionality comes in, which is entirely new to NodeBB. I don't think this is new to other AP-enabled threaded discussion software. The idea would be that if a new topic comes in, whether it's uncategorized or not, any user could "cross-post" that topic to a local category, where it would be visible to other users on that instance. On the ActivityPub side, we would then federate out an as:Announce as we already do.

Is this what PieFed/Lemmy/Mbin already do, if they support cross-posting? What other alternative solutions would there be to this problem?

cc @rimu@mastodon.nzoss.nz @andrew_s@piefed.social @nutomic@lemmy.ml @bentigorlich@wehavecookies.social

@help When I manually crosspost something from the web interface, there are different behaviors for Bluesky and Mastodon that do not make sense to me. For Bluesky, the web interface jumps back to where I was after crossposting, which is helpful. That is not the case for Mastodon. #microblog #crossposting

Who would have thought that building a publishing platform that supports cross-posting to multiple social networks all by yourself is going to be a challenge? 🤣

Every day comes with a new unexpected challenge. The UI is still the hardest part due to trouble with automatic testing. My e2e suite keeps growing and is much more stable than before but every new spec I add is a trial-and-error experience.

My strategy is to add missing spec every time a UI bug is found or there's a regression. Sometimes it can take up to an hour just to get that e2e spec pass. If you compare this to backend tests, where I can write dozens of new test scenarios in less than an hour...UI is hard 🙃

I just paid for a month of Croissant to give it a try. Already, I see that it won’t save much time because I often use the extra characters Mast allows, especially for posts from @letterformarchive. If it could give you control for splitting Bluesky posts into threads, as you’re composing, that would make it usable on a regular basis.