techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

5.3K
active users

#prepaid

1 post1 participant0 posts today
Replied in thread

@ajsadauskas @JessTheUnstill @tomiahonen yes, and to add insult to injury #Mozilla didn't even wanted to sell people like @fuchsiii or me a #FirefoxOS device, with the only one being "launched" in the #EU being a #SimLock'd & #NetLock'd #prepaid phone in #Spain one could only attain in-store with all the "#KYC" nonsense they had, demanding a legal address in Spain back then.

And #nerds like myself are far from the "#consoomer #Normies" for whom stuff that isn't on shelves at Staturn/MediaMarkt, BestBuy, Walmart, ... doesn't exist. I'm used to importing #tech that I want!

Replied in thread

@nico198X @aral @robin Problem with #PayPal et. al. is that there ain't real & global competitiors.

And not only is it impractical for people to travel in person to i.e. Germany just to wait weeks (!!!) on an appointment and get a bank accout opened in person but even then the Bsic Account as per @BaFin regulations only applies to consumers in Germany and not SMEs from overseas and even then those business accounts are usually way more expensive than partnering with an expensive payment processor to outsorce headaches.

  • Ask me how I know...

Needless to say the #PayPalMafia got their power to basically monopolize global payments...

BaFinBasic payment accountIn principle, all consumers legally residing in the European Union are entitled to hold a basic payment account under the German Payment Accounts Act (Zahlungskontengesetz – ZKG). This includes persons without a permanent place of residence and asylum seekers. Persons without a residence permit who cannot be deported due to legal or factual reasons (persons with a suspension of deportation) are also entitled to hold such an account.
Replied in thread

@Rusty @dragonarchitect I disagree re: webOS and FirefoxOS.

#webOS failed due to lack of market penetration (there was only like 1 Tablet from #hp) and #FirefoxOS failed because @mozillaofficial didn't even offer to sell devices to folks like me and @fuchsiii that wanted one.

  • The only devices with #Firefox OS in the #EU were a few #NetLock'd #prepaid phones that got sold in Spain (reqiring ID for no valid reason!) and which were essentially useless for anyone outside of Spain.

Add to that the absurdity that #Mozilla basically expected carriers (!!) to maintain and provide the #AppStore|s themselves and you get market fracturing worse than the "P.R." #China (!!!)…

It was mismanaged and self-sabotaged in the worst possible way.

  • Similar to how #OLPC never sold the #XO1 in retail and didn't even offer the "Give one, Get one" deal in most places...

The #Duopoly of #Android & #iOS wasn't unavoidable, but an outcome of #SelfSabotage and halfassed non-commitment by competitors!

Replied in thread

@tauon Also what goid is an encryption like @signalapp is you don't have #SelfCustody of all the keys?

  • Shure you could disable encryption but @monocles shows you when it's active and when not and comes with sensible defaults like having #OMEMO active per default...

I can setup over a dozen #TechIlliterates 1:1 with #XMPP accounts and #monoclesChat & @gajim / #gajim in the time it takes me to get a #nonKYC #eSIM from overseas with a phone number as mandated by @signalapp and maintaining that number for #Signal will easily cost like $2,50 p.m. at minimum.

  • Whereas a Data-only eSIM is way faster and cheaper to get and maintain.

In fact even legitimately acquiring and registering a #Prepaid #SIM in-store in #Germany takes longer than setting up #Fdroid & monocles chat & a XMPP account whilst on throttled #EDGEland speeds...

possum.city/notes/a3rt4nzbn11z

Possum City🌸 lily 🏳️‍⚧️ :flag_pansexual: :flag_ace: θΔ ⋐ & ∞ (@tauon)@kkarhan@infosec.space > centralised tbh i agree, i don't like that signal is centralised, but that isn't insecure, it's just an anti-feature > proprietary no it isn't, every element of signal is open source > subject to cloud act what is that? are you talking about subpoenaing of information? they legally have to do that anyway, and can't give anything except for the account creation date and the date that the account was last accessed > collects pii like phone numbers i'm pretty sure they don't signal is more secure than anything you've mentioned because on signal, encryption is not optional. any service where encryption is optional is not secure. RE: @tauon@possum.city no, it is not because it is a #Centralized, #proprietary, #SingleVendor & #SingleProvider solution subject to #CloudAct that collects #PII like #PhoneNumbers, which makes it inherently less secure, as they are able and willing to restrict access as they please. RE: ...
Replied in thread

Yet the same internet provider who got a loan with a very very low interest rate, that it can pay in 10 or 15 years; the internet provider who got all the equipment from Huawei to install FTTH in every building! went went crooked and installed FTTC for everyone!

Later on they removed The FTTC Connections (in a year) and went to FTTH and made the people bloody pay for it!