techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

5.3K
active users

#FreeMarket

3 posts3 participants1 post today

Just curious: What do you consider the first #capitalist society?

Generally, folks seem to think of the 19th century. Roughly when #Industrialisation moved the power to exploit people from "power by noble birth" (#Feudalism) to "power by capital ownership" (#Capitalism) on a large scale. With a lot of overlap, of course.

Yet some Marxists as well as "Capitalism= #PrivateProperty" folks argue an earlier beginning of capitalism.

Replied in thread

@ali Capitalists and entrepreneurs work too. But their work is different from the work of a driver, a baker, etc. And in the free market all people benefit from cooperation among each other. Capitalists don't exploit workers. In the #freemarket, every kind of work gets its own price. If some people get unfair wealth, it is a fault of #government interference in the #economy.

Replied in thread

@ali Ordinary people, not capitalists, are destroying the planet (while capitalists are also people). People want to live. So they want to eat. So capitalists and entrepreneurs produce food and other necessities for them. And you are wrong if you think that those who defend the #freemarket are necessarily rich. I'm putting a little pressure on nature.

"The title comes from Mises’s description of the reality of central planning and socialism, whether of the national variety (Nazism) or the international variety (communism). Rather than create an orderly society, the attempt to central plan has precisely the opposite effect." mises.org/library/book/planned #freebooks #mises #nazism #socialism #capitalism #economics #freemarket #austrianeconomics

Mises InstitutePlanned Chaos | Mises InstituteThis new edition of Planned Chaos features a new introduction by Chris Westley of Jacksonville State University. The introduction brings this classic up to date

"In 1954, after a lifetime of serious theoretical work in economic science, Mises turned his attention to one of the great puzzles of all time: discovering why the intellectuals hate capitalism. The result is this socio-psycho-cultural analysis informed by economic theory." mises.org/library/book/anti-ca #capitalism #socialism #economics #austrianeconomics #mises #freemarket #laissezfaire #freebooks

Mises InstituteThe Anti-Capitalistic Mentality | Mises InstituteIn 1954, after a lifetime of serious theoretical work in economic science, Mises turned his attention to one of the great puzzles of all time: discovering why

I'm all for Libertarianism for people who want it.

Libertarianism all the way through to the bottom, tho. Just like Nature intended.

Wassat? You can't outrun the bear because you fell down and now your knee is messed up?

That's a damn shame. Well #FreeMarket you know?

Replied in thread

In the end, no, your #closetserver or #VPS is not enough. Your #managedhosting solution is not enough. The world 🌍 runs on #cloud infra and that's not what's bad.

What's bad is how it's been implemented, how it's a threat to #privacy, how it's a threat to #DigitalSovreignty, as well as #wellfare AND #freemarket - at the same time!

So what do you do? Throw the baby out with the bathwater, or do you question the actual hardware infra, as well as the legal industrial precedents set?

Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as working economist.com/leaders/2025/02/

archive.ph/Hg11b

More wealth means more money for baby-boomers to pass on. That is dangerous for capitalism and society.

"People in advanced economies stand to inherit around $6trn this year—about 10% of GDP, up from around 5% on average in a selection of rich countries during the middle of the 20th century. As a share of output, annual inheritance flows have doubled in France since the 1960s, and nearly trebled in Germany since the 1970s."

"For supporters of free markets, the rise of the new inheritocracy should be deeply disturbing. For a start, it creates a rentier class that faces a series of bad incentives."

The Economist · Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as workingBy The Economist

Argument against #AynRand 's #Objectivism by #AnCap #DavidFriedman :

"In a [ #FreeMarket ], [...] if other actors are free to provide the service of retaliatory force in competition with the #government, it [government] will have no surplus revenue with which to fund government activities [...].

In order [...] to work, the government must have a monopoly of retaliatory force [...] to be able to collect a #monopoly profit with which to fund its other activities."

daviddfriedman.substack.com/p/

David Friedman’s Substack · ObjectivismBy David Friedman