Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

4.7K
active users

techhub.social: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.4.1

#predatorypublishing

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread
*
Till Grallert

@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons @dingemansemark

This is getting worse by the minute. I followed @christof|s hint concerning the reproduction of articles from #DHQ / @DHQuarterly looking for one of my own papers (digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/).

In this case #ProQuest blatantly violates the CC BY-ND license (creativecommons.org/licenses/b) by

- not mentioning the license
- producing a derivative
- not linking to the original

I am very much in favour of @adho.org, as the publisher of @DHQuarterly, following the path outlined by @dingemansemark. I will also log a complaint with #ProQuest through my employer.

#AcademicPublishing#Licensing#Piracy
Replied in thread
*
Till Grallert

@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons

After reading through the CC BY license I am none the wiser whether one has to clearly indicate that the material in question had been originally published somewhere else. The DOI as provided by #ProQuest reveals this fact but only after manually parsing the string with a resolver. Readers unfamiliar with the Programming Historian are made to believe that ProQuest is the original publisher or the platform officially hosting the original content.

However, ProQuest clearly violates the attribution requirements by modifying the layout and removing images. The CC BY license explicitly states that “You must […] indicate if You modified the Licensed Material”.

#AcademicPublishing#PredatoryPublishing#OpenLicenses
Open Science Pasteur

Si vous l’avez manqué, nous vous conseillons de suivre en replay le webinaire sur les éditeurs prédateurs donné par Laurence He et Mélanie Karli de l’université de Montpellier 👉 youtube.com/watch?v=yhwVQdvXFL

🕵️‍♂️ Apprenez à mieux détecter les #EditeursPredateurs dans les trois grands domaines dans lesquels ils sévissent : revues, conférences et livres

🍒 En bonus : un focus sur le phénomène des #PaperMills

YouTubeLes éditeurs prédateursBy Université de Montpellier
#PredatoryOpenAcess#PredatoryPublishing#PublicationsScientifiques
Science ouverte UnivRennes

L'enregistrement de la conférence sur les éditeurs prédateurs de Christian Funck-Brentano, Référent Intégrité Scientifique de l'Université de Lille qui a eu lieu le 1er mars est désormais accessible en ligne : pod.inserm.fr/lorier/rendez-vo 🦈 ⚛️ #PredatoryOpenAcess #PredatoryPublishing

RDV LORIER - Publier en bonne entente et hors des revues prédatrices par Christian Funck-Brentano
PODCAST RDV LORIER - Publier en bonne entente et hors des revues prédatrices par Christian Funck-BrentanoÀ l’occasion de ce webinaire, Christian Funck-Brentano vous présente la problématique posée par la multiplication de revues suspectes de complaisance dans le domaine médical et biologique et donne des indications sur la façon de les identifier et ... Added by:
MaxiKi

Kleiner Reminder an den Call for Papers #CfP für die @libreas Ausgabe 47 mit dem Thema Lug und Trug (im Wissenschaftssystem). #academicfraud #misconduct #retraction #predatorypublishing Wir freuen uns auf alle Beitragsformate 📝🎥👾🎶 Frist für Einreichungen ist der 30.04.2025. Gerne könnt ihr uns vorab schon mit eurer Idee oder einem Abstract kontaktieren #libreas 👉🏻 libreas.wordpress.com/category

LIBREAS.Library IdeasLIBREAS Call for Papers – LIBREAS.Library IdeasBeiträge über LIBREAS Call for Papers von Karsten Schuldt, libreas und .Ben
Matthias Smed Larsen

It sucks that posting a paper on #SSRN (or probably any widely used #preprint platform) results in semi-regular spam emails from predatory publishers offering to publish it in their (often thematically inappropriate) predatory journals.

Of course, most people probably send them to spam, but I imagine they're using the scattershot technique where they just need to catch a few people unaware of their practices who desperately need publications.

#AcademicPublishing#PredatoryPublishing
*
DOAJ

Our Quality Team is central to maintaining levels of trust in our service. Team members conduct in-depth investigations into cases of concern. In 2024 alone, they dedicated more than 830 hours to over 470 investigations.

Two of the team, Cenyu and Paula, have written a blog post describing some of the trends they have noticed over the last 4 years:

blog.doaj.org/2025/02/13/insid

blog.doaj.orgInside the Quality Team – Part 2: key trends from our work – DOAJ Blog
#openaccess#DOAJ#scholcomm
pol_eco_pub

"You are invited to join the editorial board of a journal" and other personal stories with the "grey zone" of publishing at MDPI. #predatorypublishing #scholcom polecopub.hypotheses.org/3231

The political economy of academic publicationsDealing with the grey zone of publishing or… how I will never be an editorial board member of MDPI Publications.The “predatory publisher” category raises more questions than answers. Just like “academic fraud”, it tends to validate a black & white world in which rules and norms are clear-cut and universally shared through time, disciplines and countries. There is now an extensive literature presenting lists, criteria and even automatic detection for such publishers or their … Continue reading "Dealing with the grey zone of publishing or… how I will never be an editorial board member of MDPI Publications."
v_i_o_l_a

"Stinging predatory journals: a brief overview and recommendations" doi.org/10.3897/ese.2025.e1379 #predatorypublishing

European Science EditingStinging predatory journals: a brief overview and recommendationsPredatory journals exploit the open access model for profit, often publishing papers with minimal or nonexistent peer review. Predatory publishing stings can identify predatory publishers and increase awareness of the problem, but there are no guidelines for effective stings. We propose that stings should include peer review red flags that would stop the sting from being accepted by reputable journals, be followed by a public sting statement to alert others to the predatory journal identified and predatory publishing in general, and avoid both payment to predatory publishers and risk to the stinger.
TrendingLive feeds
About