techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

5.3K
active users

#plurality

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Hey organizational scholars, do as the Beatles did, visit Hamburg:
icos2025.com/program/

icos2022s Webseite!ProgramOrganizing Plurality INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIOLOGY (ICOS) (Hamburg, March 27/28, 2025) Program Conference venue: Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg Campus: Holstenhofweg 85, 22041 Hamburg Building: Auditorium building (Aula Gebäude) A1 Directions: https://www.hsu-hh.de/en/university/directions Thursday, 27.03.2025 Auditorium building A1 12:00 Auditorium (Aula) Building A1 Lobby: Arrival & Coffee Plenary Session: Auditorium (Aula) 12:45 Cristina Besio & Marco Jöstingmeier: Introduction - Organizing Plurality in a Complex Society Thomas Kern, Insa Pruisken & Sarah Tell (Bremen): The Pluralities of Pluralism: The Transformation of the Field of Religious Organizations in the U.S. 13:30 Break Aula 1 Aula Aula 2 Room 403 (H1) 13:45 Violet Petit-Steeghs (Rotterdam), Katrine Iversen Glintborg (Aarhus), Silvia Buch Mejsner (Copenhagen) & Viola Burau (Aarhus): How organisations govern through multi-level, cross-sectoral boundary work Jana-Maria Albrecht (Berlin), Robert Jungmann (Trier) & Arnold Windeler (Berlin): Plural organisational roles and overlapping technological paths. A structuration perspective on the field of Germany’s energy transition Christian Frankel (Copenhagen) & Kjeld Schmidt (Copenhagen/Siegen): The organization of digitalization Marc Jungtäubl & Mascha Will-Zocholl (Wiesbaden): Digital Governance in the field of medical organizations Signe Vikkelsø & Morten Knudsen (Copenhagen): The Constitution of Organizational Misconduct: An Analysis of Danske Bank and the World's Largest Money Laundering Scandal Alexander Paulsson (Lund): Carbon Banking: The Climate Crisis and Investment in the Money-Form Ingo Bode (Kassel) & Sigrid Betzelt (Berlin): Inconsistent Governance and Accountability Overload. The Case of Childcare Organizations in Germany Nadine Arnold (Lucerne) & Fabien Foureault (Paris): Governing and integrating a socio-environmental field 14:45 Break 15:00 Nathalie Iloga Balep (Hamburg) & Christian Huber (Copenhagen): All lights on red – Pragmatist approaches in the negotiation of performance measurement indicators for prisons Kayla Phuong Hoang Irvine/Edinburgh): Breaking Barriers Beyond Bars: Navigating Discrimination Inside University for FormerlyIncarcerated and System-Impacted Students Kerstin Thummes (Greifswald): Separation and closure as pportunity or obstacle? A meta-organization’s struggle to engage sustainability and smart farming Laura Scheler (Passau): Organizing and digitizing ecological environments. A systems theory study on the case of dairy cow Konstantin Hondros (Hamburg), Sigrid Quack (DuisburgEssen) & Katharina Zangerle (Vienna): Expanding culture, not economy. A longitudinal study of justifying music sampling at court Christian Morgner (Sheffield): Temporary Organisations as Governance Spaces: Cultural Plurality in Global Festivals Höhn, Christopher (Hamburg) & Jennifer Widmer (Lucerne): Guardians of the Common Good: Formal Organizations as Civil Society Actors in Today’s Climate Governance in a World Run by the Rules of States Jennifer L. Bailey (Trondheim): From Whaling to Whale Conservation: The Transformation of the IWC 16:00 Break 16:15 Hanna Grauert (Konstanz): How to Recruit and Value Diversity: Balancing Between Symbolic Diversity Goals and Bureaucratic Principles in Practice Mareike Heller (Munich): “Non-German Language of Origin”: How an Unstable Classification Persists in the Postmigrant Education Administration Kathia Serrano Velarde (Heidelberg): Unsustainable organization? Examining StateSponsored Energy Transition Initiatives Marius G. Vigen (Trondheim): Organizing Urban Development: Idiocultural reluctance in the Urban Planning Office Jelena Brankovic (Berlin): Plurality of infrastructures and the making of world-scale organizational fields Gunhild Tøndel, Jan Tøssebro & Odd Morten Mjøen (Trondheim): Measures as machines: The making of the quantitative quality model in Norwegian municipal healthcare policy and management Stefanie Raible (Linz): Organizational praxis mediated by socio-technical futures: On the recursive interrelation of narratives, organizations, and society Cornelia Fedtke (Hamburg): Is nuclear energy green? The plurality of sustainability narratives in the social media debate 17:15 Hotel Check-In (if needed) 18:30 19:15 21:15 Transfer to boat tour (Wandsbek Markt subway/bus station) Boat tour in Hamburg Harbor (with snacks and drinks) Transfer back to Wandsbek Markt Friday, 28.03.2025 Auditorium building A1 8:30 Building A1 Lobby: Coffee Plenary session: Aula 9:00 Carly Knight (New York) & Adam Goldstein (Princeton): Ambiguous Actorhood: Twenty-First Century Firms and The Evasion of Responsibility Lars Thøger Christensen (Copenhagen): Responsible Sustainability Communication? Inquiring into the Dynamics of Socially Binding Consequences 10:00 Break Aula 1 Aula Aula 2 Room 105 (H1) 0:15 Lukas Lapschieß & Phillip Degens (Hamburg): Becoming sociocratic: Struggles in the semi-professionalization process of a remotefirst collectivist organization Holger Højlund, Klaus Brøns Laursen & Jens Ulrich (Aarhus): Who is the host? Citizen’s involvement in green transition in a rural region of Denmark Judith Nyfeler (St. Gallen) & Raimund Hasse (Lucerne): The boon and bane of being inert. The case of craft digitalization Stefan Gründler & Christian Ebner (Braunschweig): Digital twins @ work – A discussion of vocational and organizational challenges and opportunities Charlie F. Thompson (Trondheim): The Public Governance of Regulatory Organizations: A Comparative Study of Gambling Regulatory Agencies Hanne Knudsen (Copenhagen): Philanthropic giving to public education as a means to self-potentialization of private corporations Dominika Gryf & Weronika Rosa (Warsaw): The role of universities as organizations in combating sexual violence against students – results of a nationwide study of Polish universities’ anti-sexual violence systems Margit Neisig (Roskilde): Including SMEs in the Twin Transition 11:15 Break 11:30 Kathrin Lutz & Marc Mölders (Mainz): Making sustainable solutions travel: On organizational persuasion work in a differentiated society Kurt Rachlitz, Michael rotheHammer & Jennifer Bailey (Trondheim): How Do Grand Challenges Travel Between Organizations? A Case Study on the Protection of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Benjamin Doubali (Mainz): Data Space Oddity: Re-Combining Expectations in Industrial Digitalization Barbara Zyzak (Trondheim) & Deborah Agostino (Milan): Digital accountability in governance platforms: the evidence from Norwegian seamless digital services Martin Koch (Bielefeld): Introducing international groups: “a private, informal meeting of those who really matter in the world” Viveca Sjösted (Uppsala): The more the messier? How multiple representatives in a meta-organization coordinate their work Surbhi Dayal (Indore): From Marginalization to Empowerment - A Path to Plurality in Organizational Structure in Primary Education AbdulGafar Olawale Fahm (Ilorin/Bayreuth): Navigating Digital Plurality: Ethical and Organizational Challenges in Islamic Education among Nigerian Muslim Communities 12:30 Lunch (Auditorium (Aula) A1 Lobby) 13:30 Alice Neusiedler (Copenhagen): Participation as open organizing for alternatives – four forms for conceptualizing participation beyond access Thorsten Peetz (Bamberg): The shadow of competition in the digital organization of human mating Sigrunn Tvedten (Kongsberg): Emerging fields in the local organizing for inclusive childhood. A case of organizing local public school and welfare services in Norway Felix Genth, Dorina Kurta & Jaromir Junne (Hamburg): Shifting boundaries between "pure" and "dirty work" in social care: digitalization projects as an opportunity to renegotiate professional identities Iris Bartelt (Bielefeld): Navigating Deadlock in Global Labour Governance: Examining Mechanisms and Responses to Crisis and Contestation in the International Labour Organization Ole Jacob Thomassen (Kongsberg): Semiscientific Research Fields and Challenges for Governance Research Hana Fehrenbach (Freiburg): Artificial intelligence cross-sector partnerships transnationally: flourishing human-centered ecosystems? Michal Sedlačko (Bremen) & Katarína Staroňová (Bratislava): Reconciling plural, heterogeneous and conflicting expectations in ‘doing impartial policy advice’: The politics and non-politics of analytical advisory units in the Slovak public administration 14:30 Break 14:45 Leopold Ringel (Bielefeld): Organizing Evaluative Expertise Emil A. Røyrvik (Trondheim): Valorisation of value: Art and culture as instruments of value extraction or potential source for changing mindsets and modes of valuation? Klaus Dammann (Bielefeld): Nesting of Protest Movements in Non-MovementOrganizations. How Does this Contribute to Pluralistic Processing of Interests? Jonas Jutz (Friedrichshafen): Organising the Popular? Organisation, Political Inclusion, and the Challenges of Populism Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen (Copenhagen), Paul Stenner (Milton Keynes) & Dorthe Pedersen (Copenhagen): The form, function and history of saying ‘no’ in the public sector Jun Chu & René John (Berlin): The theoretical possibilities and practical limits of governmental administration 15:45 Break Plenary session: Auditorium (Aula) 16:00 Aksel Tjora (Trondheim): Local Social Rhythm as Organisational Infrastructure Stefan Arora-Jonsson, Nils Brunsson (Uppsala) & Raimund Hasse (Luzern): From competition to conflict 17:00 Closing: Auditorium (Aula)

> The foreword to the landmark 1980 DSM-III was appropriately modest and acknowledged that this diagnostic system was imprecise - so imprecise that it never should be used for forensic or insurance purposes. As we will see, that modesty was tragically short-lived.
- The Body Keeps the Score (p. 33) by Bessel Van der Kolk

WHAT THE FUCK?! EXCUSE ME?! THE DSM DID _WHAT_?!

And yet here we are. LOLOLOLOLOL

If I come across anyone who invalidates self-diagnosis again then I'm gonna smack them with this quote so hard that they get knocked out of our solar system. -Vox

#neurodivergent #DSM #psychology #psychiatry #diagnosis #selfDiagnosis #ADHD #actuallyADHD #autism #autistic #actuallyAutistic #AuDHD #actuallyAuDHD #plural #plurality #actuallyPlural @actuallyautistic @actuallyadhd @actuallyaudhd

does any entity here has a ready summary that explains (from "our" perspective) for the following:

- not all human-shaped creatures identify as "people" or "persons"
- relationship between (personhood) vs. (plurality and therarians/otherkin identities)
- how diagnoses like depersonalisation and DID can affect the above

Continued thread

If I had this body purely to myself I would make different decisions. I even have an idea of what I'd do. But that is not my reality.

Compromise literally is the only choice that has even remotely the chance of us all finding happiness, even if that happiness will look somewhat different from what we'd seek individually.

Continued thread

It is not exactly easy to find your own voice and stand up for it when you literally have no choice but to compromise with multiple other people every single day.

The alternative would be to hurt each other and: nope, we've been there and done that. That just breeds resentment and is not the path forward.

The never ending compromising is nonetheless tiring. There are needs which aren't being met but it's literally the best we can do.

We just had a lengthy conversation about the challenges of being plural, of sharing this body albeit we're so different, and it made me wonder about how difficult it is to navigate contradictory feelings and how even just I as a single person have them.

Being part of a system exacerbates that many times.

I was clicking around the blog after months in a dormancy coma and I’ve gotta say…

I love what my headmates have done with the place.

Pretty neat.

Have Allēna’s and Eight’s masterpiece album Mago as a treat before you go. If you’re finding the system via the MadMastodon tag or related ones, I think you’ll like what it has to say. It’s all about deconstructing a high control faith, surviving psychiatry and long term abuse, and finding ourselves. Enjoy.

-Castor (he/it), the system’s original host.

I'm doing something I'm slightly uncomfortable with. I'll be sharing the newly created profile of one of our system members because he asked me to.

Nicor is the "regular dude" (his words) in our system. But he has been growing a lot the last year and it's been very beneficial for many of us. More acceptance is good and all that.

If you wanna learn more about us then maybe follow him? You do you. I have no clue what he plans to write about but he is a good bean (albeit he can be dense):

undefined.social/@nicor/113908

-Vox

undefined by NULLNicor (@nicor@undefined.social)Writing intros is not easy. I already struggled to write my bio. Hi, I'm Nicor. I've been learning a lot the past year about the kind of person I want to be. I've also learned that I've not always been a good person. Reconciling these things has been a challenge but I'm trying my best. I'm part of a #plural system which has only recently been able to open up to the world about our plurality. Being a "regular dude" among colorful folks has been insightful. #introduction #introductions #welcome

Alright, this is gonna be fun. Hi, I'm Void. I'm part of this plural system. I usually lay back but I am responsible for our career. I'm not really interested in social media.

The one who is interested in social media and is tooting basically everything is our system host: Vox.

Vox is the nonbinary mess of a person. They are good with people, which is why they host. I'm not. I'm unapologetically blunt. Works great in our job though because we can abuse our white male-read privilege.

So why am I tooting? You know, this account has always been a system account. It's just been Vox's plaything. And Vox has qualms to be open about our plurality. But I do not. In fact I'm tired of hiding.

So hello world. I'm Void. I'm part of this system, as are five other headmates. All distinct and unique people. We call ourselves "the Pack" for reasons that are our own.

And in case you know us in real-life: welcome to the life of a plural system. Read this: morethanone.info

More Than OneMore Than OneA Plural 101

…i think we should properly introduce ourselves.

We are a system of… Currently five, possibly more, headmates. We are still learning as a plural system (and still learning other things, too), and we will take all the advice we can get for sorting through these thoughts.

Since we’ve recently set it up, you can check out this page to learn more about each of us we’ve found so far:
sleepingholly.neocities.org/bi

(...still a work in progress, we've never created a site before...)

sleepingholly.neocities.orgA Thoughtspace of Friends!

So, we're a plural system of 5! We each use a different emoji when we feel like actively identifying ourselves, but we don't always unless either it's relevant or we feel like it. We're very interconnected and don't have any memory separation, and we're all alright being called Pirca just as a general name we use online and having she/her pronouns used for us unless you're specifically trying to talk to/about one of us in particular. Also, we're all therian!

☀️ Mew (She/Her)
🕯️ Wisp (She/They/It)
✨ Melody (She/Her)
⚡ Raichu/Rai (She/It)
🔥 Pirca (He/Him)

More detailed descriptions in the reply~

in #plurality discourse there is a lot of talk about "front" conceived of as a singular place that, solely occupied, mutually excludes other aspects of self, and this is hard for us to grasp because for us it's all about degrees to which each aspect is facing front, as if we are collectively all present in a space oriented to our body

"Harmony in this context is not about uniformity. The true transformative potential of #harmony can be realized by embracing the tensions inherent in #plurality."

Man Fang, Post Growth Fellow, explores how #Chinese #philosophy can complement current approaches to rethinking progress: medium.com/postgrowth/rediscov