techhub.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A hub primarily for passionate technologists, but everyone is welcome

Administered by:

Server stats:

4.7K
active users

#tarsnap

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

After creating an account, almost a decade ago and depositing $5 of credit, I've finally started making use of Tarsnap - "Online backups for the truly paranoid".

Most of my stuff is either ephemeral, or simple enough to rebuild, but a few new things recently made me realise they would be a right pain in the backside to have to recreate so it's time I started getting things backed up properly.

Setup one machine this morning and got my first backup in place. I'll wait until tomorrow to make sure the overnight cron job also works and of course make sure I can recover the backups before I start celebrating.

Now, where did I put that @mwl book?

tarsnap.com/

www.tarsnap.comTarsnap - Online backups for the truly paranoidTarsnap is a secure online backup system for UNIX
Replied in thread

@alterelefant @HauntedOwlbear nodds in agreement

  • If you trust yourself and/or staff to properly make, test, verify, backroll and maintain 3-2-1 backups then #SelfHosting is the more efficient move.

That being said I do acknowledge the convenience that solutions like #Tarsnap deliver and I think @cperciva deserves the revenue he makes with this convenient, fully encrypted #backup solution that makes #AmazonGlacier easy to use...

tarsnap.com

  • I just can't use it for legal reasons neither he nor anyone else can fix - not even #Amazon - as per #CloudAct.

Needless to say it did inspire me to consider trying my hand on building something similar but without being locked to Amazon:

  • OFC I can't and won't look at tarsnap's code since it's only #SourceAvailable, not #FLOSS and I do want it to be different and not copyright infringement!
www.tarsnap.comTarsnap - Online backups for the truly paranoidTarsnap is a secure online backup system for UNIX
Replied in thread

@carlwgeorge @vermaden @samurro @tara Well, that confirms you went #ReplyGuy on me in the most disingenious way possible, wasting everyones' time and patience in the process.

  • Gues what: Good luck with that sales.pitch, cuz I'd rather give @ubuntu or @opensuse my money cuz that nonchalant attitude is insulting.

If you (or #RedHat / #IBM) don't want to support #OpenSource or anyone using anything they made for #RHEL without paying, then shure you can do that but then don't expect people to like you.

  • #grsec already did that and I'm shure it resulted in 0 extra customers.

#CentOS was in fact a "gateway distro" and had Red Hat not axed it I would've convinced my (fmr.) boss to consider paying for an RHCSA, but alas I've invested time and effort migrating from CentOS to #UbuntuLTS and even negotiated commercial support from #Canonical instead, because they were more friendly and welcoming.

  • Personally, I think that Red Hat should just be honest and just stop any #Linux contributions, instead try to upsell their customers to #zOS on z/Architecture #Mainframe|s instead cuz that was such a great business...

Even "Source Available" like #Tarsnap is better - espechally in #finance - because having actual #SourceCode available is a matter of #trust.

But I'm not getting paid to prevent Red Hat from continuing to shoot itself in the foot...

  • In fact, I'd love to short it into the ground!

infosec.space/@kkarhan/1130658

Infosec.SpaceKevin Karhan :verified: (@kkarhan@infosec.space)@carlwgeorge@fosstodon.org @vermaden@bsd.cafe @samurro@fosstodon.org @tara@bsd.cafe TBH, I know that #RHEL and #SLES can be obtained for free as a #developer - it's just that prior to #RedHat pulling the plug #CentOS was basically the *non-"Pro"* Option that was identical minus commercial support options... I personally I stick with #UbuntuLTS because #Canonical isn't in the position to pull the same without suiciding themselves as a company, and that their approach is way more friendly to me... - Not even talking about the costs of licensing commercial support, which they also offer cheaper abeit they - unlike Red Hat and #SUSE - don't have entrenched themselves to the same degree, but if a small business in facing €80k (RHEL) vs. €40k (SUSE) vs. €10k (Ubuntu Pro & Canonical Landscape) they'll likely look at the cheapest option first because the price difference can pay for an entire Sysadmin...
Replied in thread

@GrapheneOS It doesn't change the fact that #security requires #transparency and thus full access & reproduceability from source.

To give you a good example, source-available #Tarsnap demonstrates that stuff is truly securely encrypted by enabling #SelfCustody of keys and thus show they can't decrypt anything!

  • You may call me paranoid, but having 'massive trust issues' saved not only my own life more often than I'd be able to disclose so you may see this as a 'survivorship bias', but we'll only see #MassSurveillance becoming impossible when people ain't just users of some big-ass platform that can be easily targeted once it becomes inconvenient for it's host nation, but actually push for #decentralization and #TechLiteracy.

"Just use A, B, C & D, E, F" is the real threat as it sugfests people a false sense if security.

  • Just like a dresh #TechInspection doesn't prevent one to hose an engine due to lack of oil!

Collecting any #PII IS the illicit activity NO MATTER the excuse...

Sooner or later the #Enshittification of #Signal will reach a point where you'd rethink and consider apologizing...

GrapheneOS MastodonGrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)@kkarhan@infosec.space @h3artbl33d@exquisite.social @arikb@mastodon.sdf.org @tails@fosstodon.org @tails_live@venera.social Please stop leaving replies to our threads with advice. PGP and OTR are obsolete. You're giving people bad advice with a large number of comments on our threads. If you won't stop doing it yourself, we'll deal with it.
Replied in thread

@GrapheneOS I think both apps are shit as *both #Telegram and @signalapp demand #PII in the form of #PhoneNumbers.

OFC Telegram is (by my personal observation) almost exclusively being used by #Scammers and other #TechIlliterate criminals.

Replied in thread

@Yuki @BrodieOnLinux As shit as RMS his, he's sadly right.

Needless to say, @cperciva will pretty much remind people that "#SourceAvailable" is NOT #OpenSource and that #Tarsnap's #SourceCode is merely made available for #security and #auditability reasons as well as enabling people to build it for their (potentially weird) machine...
tarsnap.com/open-source.html

www.tarsnap.comTarsnap - Open SourceTarsnap Open Source Contributions

@trini and anyone else interested in the discussion (it appears @mwl wrote a book about it) - do you still use #tarsnap on a regular basis? What do you have backing up there, if you don't mind me asking?

Backstory: I had an email few weeks ago notifying me of my funds running low. I had some documents backed up there and I had about $50 prepaid - that was like 8+ years ago and I totally forgot about that...

I sent additional $20 their way, but was wondering - is it sill worth it?